Abstract -
A
growing number of local public transportation (LPT) companies
diversify their production lines by providing a large set of services.
In particular different strategies are observed depending on the
ownership structure: while private firms mainly supply competitive
markets, usually highly correlated to the core business (e.g. bus
renting and coaching activities), publicly owned companies (mainly
municipal firms) offer a very large set of products in regulated
sectors, ranging from car park management to waste disposal, water and
sewage treatment and gas and electricity distribution. The cost
properties of a sample of LPT companies operating in Piedmont, a
Northern Italy region, are investigated and the presence and the
magnitude of scope economies are assessed. The results from different
functional forms are compared and estimates point towards the presence
of global economies of scope. Scope economies for the median firm
range between 16% and 30% depending on the output definition and the
chosen cost function. Public firms always show lower scope economies.
Global density economies are also detected, but they disappear when
product specific density economies are considered.
The general picture seems to
be characterized by local public transport firms that enjoy global
scope economies, that are particularly high for private firms, i.e.
for small to medium sized firms that diversify in competitive
industries. Public firms are characterized by lower scope economies,
and sometimes diseconomies, both because of their larger size and
because of their chosen production structure. |