| Abstract - A 
          growing number of local public transportation (LPT) companies 
          diversify their production lines by providing a large set of services. 
          In particular different strategies are observed depending on the 
          ownership structure: while private firms mainly supply competitive 
          markets, usually highly correlated to the core business (e.g. bus 
          renting and coaching activities), publicly owned companies (mainly 
          municipal firms) offer a very large set of products in regulated 
          sectors, ranging from car park management to waste disposal, water and 
          sewage treatment and gas and electricity distribution. The cost 
          properties of a sample of LPT companies operating in Piedmont, a 
          Northern Italy region, are investigated and the presence and the 
          magnitude of scope economies are assessed. The results from different 
          functional forms are compared and estimates point towards the presence 
          of global economies of scope. Scope economies for the median firm 
          range between 16% and 30% depending on the output definition and the 
          chosen cost function. Public firms always show lower scope economies. 
          Global density economies are also detected, but they disappear when 
          product specific density economies are considered. 
          The general picture seems to 
          be characterized by local public transport firms that enjoy global 
          scope economies, that are particularly high for private firms, i.e. 
          for small to medium sized firms that diversify in competitive 
          industries. Public firms are characterized by lower scope economies, 
          and sometimes diseconomies, both because of their larger size and 
          because of their chosen production structure. |